Who is responsible for the terror in West China?

A leaf falls anywhere, and even before it hits the ground, the media begins harping on the same old stale theme. The blame game begins with a vengeance to demonize and mis-characterize. The Samjhota Expres was basedon Pakistan and turned out to be the work of the Indian Army’s serving colonel Prohit. The Malegaon bombs were blamed on Pakistan and investigations by Karkora showed a Hinduvata connection. The Norweigan king first blamed Islam for the Christian terrorists. Early media reports about the carnage in China di the usual–blame Pakistan. However a large body of evidence has now begun to emerge about the terror bombings in China. The Chinese media is reporting (http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2011/08/chinas-xinjiang-terrorism-claim-questioned/) that there is no evidence that the terrorists were trained in Pakistan.

  • Does the ETM still exist? Most analysts are skeptical that the body exists as a viable movement.
  • Still, many observers doubt the attack was a blow from abroad by ETIM, which they said was struggling, in disarray, and even outright defunct. Reuters
  • “All conversations I have had with people from China and Pakistan suggest a high degree of skepticism about the real viability of ETIM,” said Andrew Small, a researcher at the German Marshall Fund think tank in Brussels who studies China’s ties with Pakistan and often visits both countries.  Reuters
  • “I don’t believe that China really sees (ETIM) as a credible threat. Of course, they would always want to blame these things on foreign elements to deflect from domestic problems,” he said. Reuters

The China Digital Times headlines a story with the title “China’s Xinjiang ‘Terrorism’ Claim Questioned”

The Digital Times says that while the media does” continue to blame Pakistan-trained terrorists for lethal attacks in Xinjiang last weekend, a number of experts have questioned both claims of international involvement and China’s sincerity in making them.”

The Global Post reports that the Chinese Foreing Ministry has downplayed the Pakistani link.

  • China’s Foreign Ministrypraised Pakistan as a firm partner against terror and religious extremism Wednesday, Reuters reported.
  • The official statement downplayed the risk that China’s relationship with Pakistan might be strained by the belief that recent terrorist attacks in the restive Chinese province of Xinjiang are linked to groups based in Pakistan, the news agency said.
  • But Reuters reported that the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, Ma Zhaoxu, explicitly praised Islamabad in an apparent effort to “quash any notion of a rift over the attack in Xinjiang.”

The Digital Times asks many question about the bombs. It quotes the early reports from the “Global Times” in describing the situation in Xinjiang “Despite the government’s apparent good intentions at social engineering and its belief that education and improved living standard will fill a void, the region is a roiling cauldron filled with historic grievances and imported rage from the extremist Muslim world.”

  • The Global Times says “Terrorist groups such as the WUG and ETIM, as well as separatist groups within China, have never stopped sabotaging attempts to improve things,” said Li Wei, director of the Anti-Terrorism Institute at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations.
  • The Global Times says that “The 18 Uyghur men who attacked the police station in Hotan were reported to have spoken with an accent unfamiliar in Xinjiang. They also were reported to have raised a “jihadist flag” on the roof of the station. The attacks in Kashi were said to be linked to terrorist groups in Pakistan”.

The China Daily in its latest article does not mention Pakistan at all–focusing on internal malcontents which would be eliminated if Beijing focused ont he genuine complaints of the ethnicities.

  • To ensure the safety and security of the people, the fight against terrorists has to be intensified in accordance with law. And there should be no leniency.

Many international agencies are backing away from earlier claims about the link to Pakistan.

  • “The ETIM seems to have faded out with a whimper, rather than a bang,” Andrew McGregor, a Toronto-based security analyst wrote in a Jamestown Foundation report last year. Reuters
  • “Xinjiang faces some incidents that are terror attacks, but some are more like ethnic hate crimes,” said Jiang Zhaoyong, a Beijing-based commentator and former reporter who has studied Xinjiang for many years and often travelled there. Reuters

However Chinese and international papers like The China Times are questioning the knee jerk reaction “Such explanations are not only embraced by Chinese authorities and state media; an op-ed in The Hindu has also emphasised cross-border links and ETIM involvement in “Beijing’s increasing jihadist challenge”:

  • Many international news sources are now questioning the basis of Knew jerk reaction, and the hyper reaction in the Bharati perss. “According to Al Jazeera English, however, many experts are skeptical of ETIM’s part in the attacks, and even its continued existence:
  • Analysts and Uighur activists confirm that Chinese Muslim activists have been to Taliban-controlled regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan, but say there is no evidence that they are being trained to carry out attacks in China.
  • “I don’t think there is any reason to assume that any organization is orchestrating. Barring any evidence, it’s ridiculous to make such a claim,” Dru Gladney, an expert on Xinjiang politics at the US-based Pacific Basin Institute, said.
  • In fact, some experts even question whether the ETIM is still active.
  • “I have seen no irrefutable evidence that ETIM still exists … or that it is responsible for the recent round of violence,” Gardner Bovingdon, a professor of Central Asian studies at Indiana University, said.

The skepticism is not limited to Middle Eastern Newspapers. Mainstream news services like Reuters are also questioning the claim about the Pakistani connection:

  • The biggest threat to China’s grip on its ethnically divided far western frontier comes from homegrown anger exploding in violence, not from Pakistan-based terrorists officials have blamed for the latest bloodshed.
  • “All conversations I have had with people from China and Pakistan suggest a high degree of skepticism about the real viability of ETIM,” said Andrew Small, a researcher at the German Marshall Fund think tank in Brussels who studies China’s ties with Pakistan and often visits both countries.
  • “I don’t believe that China really sees (ETIM) as a credible threat. Of course, they would always want to blame these things on foreign elements to deflect from domestic problems,” he said ….
  • Rahimullah Yusufzai, a Pakistani expert, said Chinese officials told him there were only between 30 and 80 Uighur militants in Pakistan’s tribal areas ….
  • “The ETIM seems to have faded out with a whimper, rather than a bang,” Andrew McGregor, a Toronto-based security analyst wrote in a Jamestown Foundation report last year ….
  • “The ETIM has a very narrow support and sympathizer base, and most of its operatives have been killed or captured by the Chinese,” said Rohan Gunaratna, an expert on terrorism at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.

The New York Times proxies in Pakistan (Tribune), as well as Dawn and the Daily Times continue to harp on the old themes. The CIA and RAW have been very active in the region. It is not outside the realm of possibility that there are attempts to sabotage the Pakistan-China “All weather friendship”.

Chinese investments and projects in the country amounted to US$ 25 billion which were multiplying with each passing day.

Source : Rupee News

Advertisements

One Comment to “Who is responsible for the terror in West China?”

  1. i am pakistani and i am proud as friend of china…………..pakistani are not terrorist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: